Abstract
This paper examines the prolonged conflict between India’s Public Stockholding (PSH) program and Minimum Support Price (MSP) mechanisms for food security, and the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Agreement on Agriculture (AoA). It argues that this is not a mere technical dispute over subsidy calculations but a fundamental clash between two paradigms, the sovereign right of a nation to ensure food security for its population and a trade liberalisation framework that reflects the historical power asymmetries of the global economic order. The paper traces India's agricultural policy, beginning with the Green Revolution, which necessitated the creation of a domestic support mechanism, including the Public Distribution System (PDS) and the Minimum Support Price (MSP). This domestic framework, designed to achieve national self-sufficiency, now stands in direct opposition to the AoA's rules on domestic support. The paper deconstructs the technical core of the conflict, the WTO's Aggregate Measurement of Support (AMS) methodology and its outdated reference prices, and analyses the political stalemate at the WTO over a permanent solution for public stockholding (PSH). Ultimately, it contends that India's steadfast position is a defense of its foundational food security policies and a broader challenge to international trade regime that has historically failed to accommodate the development imperatives of the Global South.
References
1. Acharya, K. C. S. (1983). Food Security System of India. Concept Publishing Company.
2. Agriculture Institute. (2023). The Green Revolution: Transforming India's Agriculture. https://www. google.com /search?q=https://agriculture. ins itute /a gribusiness-mgt-policies/green -revolution-india-agri-
3. Bandyopadhyay, U., & Patnaik, A. (2025). From Green Revolution to Millet Revolution: Understanding India's Transition Through Agri Food Policies. Food, Culture & Society. https:// www. google. com/search?q=https: //doi.org /10.10 80/1 5528 014.20 -25.2485505
4. Comptroller & Auditor General of India. (2015). Audit on the Preparedness for Implementation of National Food Security Act, 2013 for the year ended March, 2015. Report No. 54. https://cag.gov.in/u ploads /download_audit_report /2016/Union_Civil _National_Food_Security_ Report_54_of_2015.pdf.
5. Desta, M. G. (2006). Legal Issues in International Agricultural Trade: The Evolution of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture from Its Uruguay Round Origins to Its Post-Hong Kong Directions. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
6. Dipasha, M. (2015). Food Security in India: Issues and Challenges. New Delhi: Rajesh Publications.
7. Manduna, C., & Murphy, S. (2024). Public Stocks at the WTO: Making Sense of Food Security and Agriculture Negotiations. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.
8. Sharma, S. K., Lahiri, T., & Kamal, T. A. (2025). Unsung Heroes of WTO Food Security Battles. Down To Earth. https://www.google. com/search?q=https:// www.downtoearth.org.in/agriculture /unsung-heroes-of-wto-food-security-battle
9. Vadlamani, H. (2025). The Downstream Effects of India's Green Revolution. UNDARK. https:// undark. org /2025/02/0/downstream-india-green-revolution/
10. Yigzaw, D. A. (2015). WTO Agricultural Trade and the Unfulfilled Promise of Development. South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business, 1(2). https://www.google.com/search?q=https://scholarcommons .sc.edu/scjilb/vol1/iss2/6

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 South India Journal of Social Sciences
