Crossref JGate SDG Google Scholar Open Access Creative Commons WorldCat OCLC DORA Scilit Semantic Scholar SDG
Publication Trends in E-book Research: A Web of Science-Based Bibliometric Analysis (2017–2025)
ARTICLE PDF FILE

Keywords

Web of Science
Bibliometric analysis
Research productivity
Citation
e-books

Categories

How to Cite

Rai, A., & K. Saini, P. (2026). Publication Trends in E-book Research: A Web of Science-Based Bibliometric Analysis (2017–2025). South India Journal of Social Sciences, 24(5), 134-138. https://doi.org/10.62656/SIJSS.v24i5.2531

Abstract

This study examines the global scientific outputs on e-books research by analyzing data on literature indexed by the Web of Science database during the year 2017 and 2025. The data is analyzed based on parameters such as the document types, language, publication output, citations, collaborations, journals, prolific authors, productive countries and most frequently appeared top words/phrases in the title of the articles. Literature on e-books is gradually declining. USA and China were the most productive countries. Journal of Academic Librarianship was the most productive journal, which has published 28 articles on e-books, followed by Journal of Librarianship and Information Science (20) and College & Research Libraries (13). Zhang, Mei of Simmons University, United States was the most productive author on e-books research. As depicted by the word/phrase analysis the researchers were keen on investigating the impact, usage behavior and models of e-books.

ARTICLE PDF FILE

References

1. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

2. Armstrong, C., Edwards, L., & Lonsdale, R. (2002). Virtually there? E‐books in UK academic libraries. Program Electronic Library and Information Systems, 36(4), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330330210447181

3. Bennett, L. (2006). E-books: The options: a manual for publishers. The Publishers Association, London.

4. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visu-alizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Infor-mation Science and Technology, 37(1), 179–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106

5. Crane D, (1972). Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. University of Chicago Press.

6. e-book. (2026). In Merriam-Webster Dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/e-book

7. Gardiner, E. & Musto, R. (2010). The electronic book. In H. R. Woudhuysen & M. F. Suarez (Eds.), The Oxford companion to the book (pp. 164–171). Oxford University Press.

8. Gold Leaf. (2003). Promoting the uptake of e-books in higher and further education. JISC e-Books Work-ing Group. www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/PromotingeBooksReportB.pdf

9. Hart, M. (1992). The history and philosophy of pro-ject Gutenberg. https://wwwgutenberg.org/about/background/history_and_philosophy.html.

10. Kolle, S. R., Shankarappa, T. H., Arun, M., & Reddy, T. M. (2017). Characteristics and trends in global lead removal research: a Science Citation Index Ex-panded-based analysis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 80, 164–173. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.20968

11. Kolle, S. R., Shettar, I., M, V. K., & GS, P. (2018). Publication trends in literature on eBooks: a Scopus based bibliometric analysis. Collection and Curation, 37(3), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/cc-07-2017-0027

12. Landoni, M. (2003). Electronic books. In J. Feather, & P. Sturges (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of In-formation and Library Science (Second Edition, pp. 168–171). Routledge.

13. Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of In-formetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002

14. McLuckie, A. (2005). E‐books in an academic li-brary: implementation at the ETH Library, Zurich. The Electronic Library, 23(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470510582772

15. Paradijs H. V. (2026). Twenty years of eBooks: How libraries turned a quiet shift into a global revolution in digital access. SpringerNature. https://www.springernature.com/gp/librarians/the-link/ebooks-blogpost/20-years-ebooks libraries-global-digital-access/27838938

16. Ramaiah, C. K. (2005). An overview of electronic books: a bibliography. The Electronic Library, 23(1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470510582718

17. Rao, S. S. (2005). Electronic books: their integration into library and information centers. The Electronic Library, 23(1), 116–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470510582790

18. Singh, M., & Kumar, S. (2025). Narrowing the Digi-tal Gap: Factors affecting E-Book Adoption in Del-hi’s Higher Education Institutions. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 72(01). https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v72i1.13749

19. Tedd, L. A. (2005). E-books in academic libraries: an international overview. New Review of Academic Li-brarianship, 11(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614530500417701

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 South India Journal of Social Sciences

Disclaimer: This site displays third-party advertisements provided through Google AdSense. We do not control the content of these ads and do not endorse any products or services advertised. Ad revenue helps minimize APCs and supports the ongoing maintenance, development, and open accessibility of this academic journal.