Crossref JGate SDG Google Scholar Open Access Creative Commons WorldCat OCLC DORA Scilit Semantic Scholar SDG
The Ulama as a Pressure Group during the Indian Freedom Struggle: An Analysis
ARTICLE PDF FILE

Keywords

Indian
Islamic
Political
Pressure Group
Ulama

Categories

How to Cite

Ahmed, A. I. . (2026). The Ulama as a Pressure Group during the Indian Freedom Struggle: An Analysis. South India Journal of Social Sciences, 24(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.62656/

Abstract

Ulama—Islamic scholars and religious leaders—acted as a pressure group during the Indian freedom struggle, a crucial but untapped aspect of South Asian anti-colonial politics. This study investigates how the Ulama mobilised religious authorities and community networks to resist British colonial rule and promote nationalist ideology. The research shows the Ulama’s dual dedication to religious revivalism and national freedom by examining their engagement in the Khilafat Movement, the Non-Cooperation Movement, and constitutional reform debates between 1937 and 1947. The study places the Ulama’s activism in the context of Islamic political theory and growing nationalist currents using archival documents, political pamphlets, and contemporary literature. The findings suggest that the Ulama mediated between the masses and political elites and affected public opinion by promoting Islamic and nationalist principles. They balanced faith, identity, and politics to preserve religious liberty and support anti-imperialist objectives. The paper also claims that Ulama’s influence transcended religion, contributing to the independence movement’s moral and ideological foundations even as it later exacerbated communal polarisation. This study highlights the Ulama’s deliberate use of religious legitimacy to influence public policy, exert political pressure, and redefine Muslim engagement in the independence movement by reinterpreting their role as a pressure group rather than just religious reformers. The analysis enhances understanding of religion, politics, and colonial resistance in contemporary Indian history.

ARTICLE PDF FILE

References

1. Ahmad, I. (2011). The Ulama in Contemporary India: Religious Authority and Political Influence. Oxford University Press.

2. Almond, G. A., & Powell, G. B. (1966). Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Little, Brown & Co.

3. Azad, A. K. (1959). India wins freedom. Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan.

4. Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. MIT Press.

5. Hasan, F. (2004). State and Locality in Mughal India: Power Relations in Western India, c.1572–1730. Cambridge University Press.

6. Hasan, M. (1997). Legacy of a Divided Nation: India’s Muslims since Independence. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

7. Hasan, M. (1991). Nationalism and Communal Politics in India, 1885–1930. Manohar.

8. Jalal, A. (1985). The Sole Spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League and the Demand for Pakistan. Cambridge University Press.

9. Jones, K. W. (2019). Socio-Religious Reform Movements in British India. Cambridge University Press.

10. Metcalf, B. D. (2009). Husain Ahmad Madani: The Jihad for Islam and India’s Freedom. Oneworld Publications.

11. Metcalf, B. D. (1982). Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860–1900. Princeton University Press.

12. Minault, G. (1982). The Khilafat Movement: Religious Symbolism and Political Mobilization in India. Columbia University Press.

13. Qasmi, A. U. (2015). The Ahmadis and the Politics of Religious Exclusion in Pakistan. Anthem Press.

14. Rizvi, S. A. A. (1982). A History of Sufism in India (Vol. II). Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.

15. Robinson, F. (1974). Separatism among Indian Muslims: The Politics of the United Provinces’ Muslims, 1860–1923. Cambridge University Press.

16. Robinson, F. (2001). The Ulama of Farangi Mahall and Islamic Culture in South Asia. Oxford University Press.

17. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

18. Truman, D. B. (1951). The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. Alfred A. Knopf.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 South India Journal of Social Sciences

Disclaimer: This site displays third-party advertisements provided through Google AdSense. We do not control the content of these ads and do not endorse any products or services advertised. Ad revenue helps minimize APCs and supports the ongoing maintenance, development, and open accessibility of this academic journal.