Abstract
Eastern and Western parts of Uttar Pradesh plains have always showed different patterns and levels of development throughout the post-independence period whether it was adoption of new technology, public investment, irrigation or cropping pattern. In fact, such regional differences in these two regions existed even during the colonial period. It is in this historical context the present study evaluate the MGNREGA performance in Ballia and Meerut districts of eastern and western Uttar Pradesh. It brings out similarities and contrasts in the performance of the programme in terms of outreach, demand patterns, employment provision, persondays generated and social inclusion of disadvantaged groups such as women and scheduled caste/ scheduled Tribe. Official MGNREGA data has been used for the comparative analyses of two districts. Data has been analyses by computing the triennium averages for the three year period (2022-23, 2023-24, 2024-25). the study finds that in Ballia MGNREGA is an integral part of livelihood strategies of the labour households and functions as a core stabilising institution. On the other hand, in the west Uttar Pradesh districts such as Meerut, which is more diversified in terms of employment, the programme generally operates as supplementary and residual safety net to which the labour households resort in adverse times. In both the districts monthly demand pattern is synchronised with the rhythms of the agricultural production cycle.
References
1. GOI, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare (2021-22 to 2023-24), Agricultural Wages in India (AWI). eands.da.gov.in. Desagri.gov.in.
2. Banerjee, A., & Iyer, L. (2005). History, institutions, and economic performance: The legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India. American economic review, 95(4), 1190-1213.
3. Bhaduri, A. (1985). Class Relations and Commercialisation in Indian Agriculture: A Study in the Post-Independence Reforms of Uttar Pradesh' in KN Raj et al.(eds.), Essays in the Commercialisation of Indian Agriculture. OUP
4. Government of India, Census of India (2011). Provisional Population Totals. New Delhi: 409-413.
5. Government of Uttar Pradesh (2021-24). Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Statistical Diary Uttar Pradesh https://updes.up.nic.in/esd/reports_publication_Elib_public.htm
6. Government of Uttar Pradesh (2021-2024). Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Statistical Abstract https://updes.up.nic.in/esd/reports_publication_Elib_public.htm
7. Government of Uttar Pradesh (2021-2024). Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Inter-district comparative Statistics https://updes.up.nic.in/esd/reports_publication_Elib_public.htm
8. Etienne, G. (1968). Studies in Indian agriculture: the art of the possible. University of California Press.
9. Government of India (2021-25). Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme: Annual Reports. Ministry of Rural Development.) https://nrega.nic.in
10. Rajni, V. (2007). Casual labour contracts of agricultural labourers in east and west Uttar Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 154-160.
11. Stokes, E. (1978). The Peasant and the Raj: Studies in Agrarian Society and Peasant Rebellion in Colonial India. Cambridge.
12. Stokes, E. (1983). Agrarian relations in northern and central India in . Raychaudhuri, T., et al. (Eds.). The Cambridge Economic History of India: Volume 2, C. 1757-c. 1970. CUP.
13. Stone, I. (1984). Canal Irrigation in British India: Perspectives on Technological Change in a Peasant Economy. Cambridge.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 South India Journal of Social Sciences
