Crossref JGate SDG Google Scholar Open Access Creative Commons WorldCat OCLC DORA Scilit Semantic Scholar SDG
Digital Natives vs Digital Adopters: A Comparative Study of Technology Dependence and Behavioural Outcomes Across Generations, Gen Z And Millennials
ARTICLE PDF FILE

Keywords

Technology Dependence
Digital Natives
Digital Adopters
Millennials
Generation Z

Categories

How to Cite

T J, S., & P P, S. (2026). Digital Natives vs Digital Adopters: A Comparative Study of Technology Dependence and Behavioural Outcomes Across Generations, Gen Z And Millennials. South India Journal of Social Sciences, 24(5), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.62656/SIJSS.v24i5.2481

Abstract

The behaviour of every person is developed by social, economic, cultural and technological environment factors where they are born and grow, they exhibit similar patterns shaped by their formative environmental factors. The generation Millennials witnessed the technological and economic advancements, especially the impact of globalisation. They are digital adopters because they gradually adapted to the emerging technologies, the internet, mobile phone, online trade and social media. Generation Z are didital natives born in a world of digital and technological advancements and a social environment. These environmental factors may influence the behaviour, lifestyle, social involvements, economic, financial and career decisions of both generations. This study is a quantitative research to compare the technological dependence and behaviour of Millennials and Generation Z by collecting the data from 112 respondents from each generation randomly through a structured questionnaire. The data was analysed by using descriptive statistics and an independent t-test. The study found that both generations are involved in the adoption of technologies; Gen Z is more confident, adaptable, and open to technological advancements than Millennials. By considering psychological and motivational factors, Millennials consider personal attitude and peers, and analyse the options before making decisions. Gen Z is more focused on self-expression and recognition, and more concentrated on trends and influencers while making decisions. Comparison of the variable life stage and economic orientation showed that Millennials prioritise financial and career stability and are ready to take risks when necessary. While Gen Z focuses on timing flexibility and is ready to switch career while getting better option. The result of social influence depicts that millennials are more socially influenced, while Gen Z is influenced by online communities and groups. Both are influenced at the same level by the family and responsibilities. Social media usage reveals that Gen Z is more used to social media as compared to Millennials, while both groups show equally engaging in social media for social and health-related content. The analysis on buying behaviour indicates that Millennials give more consideration to price and discount, while Gen Z consider brands and trends while shopping and both prefer online shopping.

 

 

ARTICLE PDF FILE

References

1.Betlej, A. (2023). Social Networks, New Tech-nologies, and Wellbeing—An Interview Study on Factors Influencing Older Adults’ Successful Ageing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

2. Elder, Jr, G. (1998). The life course as develop-mental theory. Child Development.

3. Lolokote, S., & Hidru, T. H. (2017). Do socio-cultural factors influence college students’ self-rated health status and health-promoting life-styles? A cross-sectional multicenter study in Dalian, China. BMC Public Health .

4. Ryden, L. (2015). Technological Development and Lifestyle Changes. In Sustainable Develop-ment, Knowledge Society and Smart Future Man-ufacturing Technologies, 113-124.

5. Saitkulovich, A. M. (2025). Social factors influ-encing the lifestyle of young people. Western Eu-ropean Journal of Historical Events and Social Science.

6. Azhar, A. (2025).The influence of homo iphone on trends, lifestyle and buying decisions in case study on gen z. Pedagogic Research-Applied Lit-eracy Journal, 198-208.

7. Bandura , A. (1977). Social learning theory.

8. Curtis, T. K. (2005). Changing living conditions, life style and health. sid.ir.

9. Fomina, A., & Timokhina, T. (2021). Trends in changing the value system of the young genera-tion in modern conditions.

10. Francis, E. V., Nirmala, T., & Jose, E. J. (2025). The Role of Media in Shaping Career Choices: A Content Analysis of Social Media's Influence on College Students’ Preference for Influencing Over Traditional Employment in Kerala. In In-ternational Congress on Information and Com-munication Technology (pp. 159-167). ingapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

11. Gazzola, P., Pavione, E., Pezzetti, R., & Greechi, D. (2020). he perception of sustainability and circular economy: a gender/generation quantita-tive approach. Sustainability, 2809.

12. Gupta, N., & Gurnani, K. (2024). Factors affect-ing consumer behaviour in Indian fashion retail industry: A study of recent trends and prefer-ences. International Journal for Multidiscipli-nary Research, 58-61.

13. Imelia, V. J., A. U., Ingtyas, F. T., & L. G. (2024). Analsis of the impact of lifestyle changes on fast food consumption trends amoung millen-nial implication for educational awareness . journal.jcopublishing.com, 89-98.

14. Jones, I., Ekerdt, D. J., & Higgs, P. (2017). Con-sumption and generational change: The rise of consumer lifestyles. In Consumption and genera-tional change , Routledge.

15. Katz, E., & et al. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly.

16. Kotler, P., & Keller. (2016). Marketing manage-ment.

17. Madhvapaty, H., & Dasgupta, A. (2015). Study of Lifestyle Trends on Changing Food Habits of In-dian. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology (IOSR-JESTFT), 16-22.

18. Mannheim, K. (1952). Essays on the sociology of knowledge.

19. Mashitoh, I., & Octafian, R. (2025). The Trend of Payment Method Shifts Among Gen Z from Tra-ditional to Modern. nternational Journal of Ap-plied Economics, Accounting and Management (IJAEAM), 181-192.

20. Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motiva-tion. Psychological Review.

21. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man.

22. Mobasseri, K. (2025). Factors Influencing Healthy Lifestyle Among Older Adults: A Quali-tative Study. Activities, Adaptation & Agin, 136-160.

23. O, K., OM, J., & Mehra, P. (2025). Factors af-fecting the demand of lab-grown diamonds: A case of India. Building business knowledge for complex modern business environments, 443-466.

24. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital im-migrants. On the Horizon.

25. Rameshkkumar, S., Gope, P., Santhosh, R., San-thosh, R., Gawande, N., & Vishnu, M. (2024). Exploring the severity of factors influencing life-style on housing preference of young adults: a thematic analysis. Migration Letters,, 1013-1023.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 South India Journal of Social Sciences

Disclaimer: This site displays third-party advertisements provided through Google AdSense. We do not control the content of these ads and do not endorse any products or services advertised. Ad revenue helps minimize APCs and supports the ongoing maintenance, development, and open accessibility of this academic journal.