Keywords
Scientometric Analysis
Citation Analysis
Web of Science
VOS Viewer
How to Cite
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the scholarly literature on Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and determine how it has changed from 2014 to 2023. Clarivate's Web of Science database, which contains reputable and significant scientific research, was used to obtain published research articles on DRR. Numerous factors were considered, such as publications by journals, organizations, and nations, citation scores, and the increase in publications. We chose "Disaster Risk Reduction" as the key phrase for papers published during this period using state-of-the-art bibliometric techniques. The results reveal that from 2014 to 2023, 10,168 documents on DRR were published, involving 26,568 authors and 1,744 journals. Shaw R stands out significantly with the highest number of records (143) and the highest Total Global Citation Score (TGCS) (1515), indicating a robust research output and influence in the field. The International Journal of DRR is the dominant publication, with 3894 records, accounting for 38.3% of total contributions. Cutter SL (2003) leads with 429 records (4.2%), indicating a significant impact on the field. his foundational work has likely shaped subsequent research in disaster risk. Following closely is Cutter SL (2008), with 362 records (3.6%), further emphasizing the author’s influential role in disaster studies. Our findings reveal emerging trends and highlight gaps in the current literature, offering insights for future research. By providing a thorough picture of the academic environment in this important area, this report seeks to support ongoing efforts to comprehend and reduce disaster risks.
References
1. Orimoloye, I. R., Belle, J. A., & Ololade, O. O. (2021). Exploring the emerging evolution trends of disaster risk reduction research: a global scenario. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 18, 673-690.
2. Yu, T., Yang, H., Luo, X., Jiang, Y., Wu, X., & Gao, J. (2021). Scientometric analysis of disaster risk perception: 2000–2020. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(24), 13003.
3. Sahil, & Sood, S. K. (2021). Scientometric analysis of natural disaster management research. Natural Hazards Review, 22(2), 04021008.
4. Neelam, S., & Sood, S. K. (2020). A scientometric review of global research on smart disaster management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(1), 317-329.
5. Xu, H., Li, Y., Tan, Y., & Deng, N. (2021). A scientometric review of urban disaster resilience research. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(7), 3677.
6. Kaur, A., & Sood, S. K. (2020). Ten years of disaster management and use of ICT: a scientometric analysis. Earth Science Informatics, 13(1), 1-27.
7. Djalante, R. (2018). A systematic literature review of research trends and authorships on natural hazards, disasters, risk reduction and climate change in Indonesia. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 18(6), 1785-1810.
8. Sood, S. K., & Rawat, K. S. (2021). A scientometric analysis of ICT-assisted disaster management. Natural hazards, 106(3), 2863-2881.
9. Owolabi, T. A., & Sajjad, M. (2023). A global outlook on multi-hazard risk analysis: A systematic and scientometric review. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 92, 103727.
10. Roslan, M. Z. H., Sofyan, D., Oluwatoyin, I.
M., Rojo, J. R., & Abdullah, K. H. (2022). A scientometric review of disaster education: Does it matter? Journal of Metrics Studies and Social Science, 1(2), 101-111.
11. Rana, I. A. (2020). Disaster and climate change resilience: A bibliometric analysis. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 50, 101839.
12. Kim, B. J., Jeong, S., & Chung, J. B. (2021). Research trends in vulnerability studies from 2000 to 2019: Findings from a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 56, 102141.
13. Sood, S. K. (2021, February). Scientometric Exploration of ICT-based Smart Disaster Management Research: A Practitioner's View. In 2021 Third International Conference on Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks (ICICV) (pp. 1184-1191). IEEE.
14. Correia, A., Paulino, D., Paredes, H., Fonseca, B., Jameel, S., Schneider, D., & de Souza, J. M. (2021, May). Scientometric Research Assessment of IEEE CSCWD Conference Proceedings: An Exploratory Analysis from 2001 to 2019. In 2021 IEEE 24th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) (pp. 311-316). IEEE.
15. Sood, S. K. (2023). Quantum computing review: A decade of research. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 6662-6676.
16. Sivasekaran, K., Sivankalai, S., & Stanleay, P. (2021). Bats are the only flying Mammal: A Scientometric Analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-20.
17. Goerlandt, F., Li, J., & Reniers, G. (2020). The landscape of risk communication research: A scientometric analysis. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(9), 3255.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 South India Journal of Social Sciences