Crossref JGate SDG Google Scholar Open Access Creative Commons WorldCat OCLC DORA Scilit Semantic Scholar SDG
Between Reverence and Reduction: The Complexities of Female Identity in Sarah Elizabeth Holmes’ and Margaret Atwood’s Writings
ARTICLE PDF FILE

Keywords

Autonomy
Individuality
Reduction
Reverence

Categories

How to Cite

Glory, S., & A, S. P. (2026). Between Reverence and Reduction: The Complexities of Female Identity in Sarah Elizabeth Holmes’ and Margaret Atwood’s Writings. South India Journal of Social Sciences, 24(1), 74-79. https://doi.org/10.62656/

Abstract

This study explores the intricate dynamics between Reverence and Reduction in the context of women’s individuality, examining the works of 19th-century thinker Sarah Elizabeth Holmes and contemporary author Margaret Atwood. Through a comparative analysis of their perspectives, this research highlights the persistent struggle for autonomy and self–definition that women face. Sarah’s advocacy for individual rights and natural law is juxtaposed with Atwood’s literary explorations of women’s experiences, revealing a complex interplay between societal expectations, personal identity, and the quest for independence. By investigating the tensions between Reverence and Reduction, this paper argues that the erosion of individuality can lead to a power vacuum. The study concludes that the pursuit of autonomy and self-determination remains a fundamental challenge for women, underscoring the ongoing relevance of Holmes and Atwood‘s insights into the human experience.

ARTICLE PDF FILE

References

1. Atwood, M. (1982). Life before man. Virago Press.

2. Atwood, M. (2009). The edible woman. Virago Press.

3. Atwood, M. (2015). The heart goes last. Bloomsbury.

4. Baker, C. N. (2008). The women’s movement against sexual harassment. Cambridge Univer-sity Press.

5. Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domina-tion: Studies in the phenomenology of oppres-sion. Routledge.

6. Baumgardner, J. (2000). A day without femi-nism. Straus & Giroux.

7. Bennett, J. M. (1989). Feminism and history. Gender & History, 1(3), 251–272.

8. Bichicean, G. (2023). “Who knows what we’d make of it, if we ever got our hands on it?” The Bible and Margaret Atwood (R. Graybill & P. J. Sabo, Eds.). Partial Answers, 21(1), 173–175. https://doi.org/10.1353/pan.2023.0000

9. Colebrook, C. (2004). Gender. Palgrave Mac-millan.

10. Dimulescu, V. (2015). Contemporary represen-tations of the female body: Consumerism and the normative discourse of beauty. Symposion, 2(4), 505–514.

11. Fortuin, S. (2009). Re-constructing identity through language and vision in Margaret At-wood’s Surfacing and Cat’s Eye [Master’s the-sis, University of Cape Town]. University of Cape Town Repository. https://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/8240

12. Gorjup, B. (2008). Margaret Atwood: Essays on her works. Guernica. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA91512348

13. Hooks, B. (2001). Sexual correctness: The gen-der-feminist attack on women. McFarland.

14. López Ramírez, M. (2022). “Completion of a circle”: Female process of self-realization and individuation in Margaret Atwood’s The rob-ber bride and “I dream of Zenia with the bright red teeth.” ES Review, 43, 183–205. https://doi.org/10.24197/ersjes.43.2022.183-205

15. McElroy, W. (2001). Individualist feminism of the nineteenth century. McFarland.

16. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y.-P. (2008). Objectifica-tion theory and psychology of women: A dec-ade of advances and future directions. Psy-chology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x

17. Moss, K. (2011). Margaret Atwood’s divided self [Master’s thesis, University of Vermont]. ScholarWorks @ UVM. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1156&context=graddis

18. Nischik, R. M. (2010). Engendering genre: The works of Margaret Atwood. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/809

19. Shaw, S. M., & Lee, J. (2012). Women's voices, feminist visions: Classic and contemporary readings (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

20. Vlašković, B. (2011). Margaret Atwood’s Sur-facing: Quest for the other, finding the self. Philologia, 9(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.18485/PHILOLOGIA.2011.9.9.11

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 South India Journal of Social Sciences

Disclaimer: This site displays third-party advertisements provided through Google AdSense. We do not control the content of these ads and do not endorse any products or services advertised. Ad revenue helps minimize APCs and supports the ongoing maintenance, development, and open accessibility of this academic journal.