Crossref JGate SDG Google Scholar Open Access Creative Commons WorldCat OCLC DORA Scilit Semantic Scholar SDG
Tribal Political Parties in Tripura: Agents of Democratic Consolidation or Fragmentation?
ARTICLE PDF FILE

Keywords

Conflict
Democracy
Immigration
Insurgency
Political Parties
Tribal

Categories

How to Cite

Debbarma, A. ., & Haokip, K. (2025). Tribal Political Parties in Tripura: Agents of Democratic Consolidation or Fragmentation?. South India Journal of Social Sciences, 23(5), 84-87. https://doi.org/10.62656/SIJSS.v23i5.2153

Abstract

This article examines whether tribal political parties in Tripura, which saw their ascendancy in the aftermath of tribal insurgency, function as agents of democratic consolidation or democratic instability, ethnic divisions, and polarisation. It argues that these parties play a dual role in shaping the state's democratic processes—both deepening and undermining democracy. By providing the marginalised tribal communities a platform to articulate their political interests, tribal-centric parties have functioned to promote democratic inclusion and participation. On the other hand, they have also contributed to democratic fragmentation by accentuating ethnic cleavages and political polarisation. In the face of these two contrasting roles, the article contends that through accommodative responses by the state and the dominant societal groups, tribal political parties in Tripura can be transformed into positive agents of democratisation. 

ARTICLE PDF FILE

References

1. Bhaumik, S. (2012). Tripura: Ethnic Conflict, Mili-tancy and Counterinsurgency. Mahanirban Calcutta Research Group.

2. Brass, P. (1991). Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison. Sage Publications.

3. Chandra, K. (2005). Ethnic parties and democratic stability. Perspectives on Politics, 3(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592705050188

4 Cohen, F. S. (1997). Proportional versus majoritarian ethnic conflict management in democra-cies. Comparative Political Studies, 30(5), 607-630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414097030005004

5. Das, S. K. (2007). Conflict and Peace in India’s Northeast: The role of civil society. East-West Center.

6. Debbarma, R. K. (2013). Heroes and Histories: The making of rival geographies of Tripura. Nehru Me-morial Museum and Library.

7. Economic Times. (2023). ‘Greater Tipraland not pos-sible, says Tripura CM Manik Saha,’ Feb. 5. https://theprint.in/india/greater-tipraland-not-possible-says-tripura-cm/1354744/

8. Horowitz, D. (1985). Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Uni-versity of California Press.

9. IPFT (Indigenous Peoples Front of Tripura). (2022). Memorandum to Home Minister of India, August 23 (in Authors’ possession).

10. Kumar, K. (2016). Police and Counter-Insurgency: The Untold Story of Tripura’s COIN Campaign. Sage Publications.

11. Lijphart, A. (1975). The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Univer-sity of California Press.

12. Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy In Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. Yale University Press.

13. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. (2018).https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/filefield_paths/HLC_Tripura.PDF

14. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. (2024). Press Release, https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2010880

15. Tripura Times. (2022). ‘Greater Tipraland demand aims at dividing Tripura: Amra Bangali,’ December 10.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 South India Journal of Social Sciences

Disclaimer: This site displays third-party advertisements provided through Google AdSense. We do not control the content of these ads and do not endorse any products or services advertised. Ad revenue helps minimize APCs and supports the ongoing maintenance, development, and open accessibility of this academic journal.