Abstract
This study investigates the socio-economic dynamics of Odia migrant workers employed in Honda Industrial Estate, Goa, exploring how migration shapes their livelihoods and adaptation experiences through analytical lens of Social Network theory (SNT). The research is guided by two core objectives: identifying key push-pull factors influencing migration and assessing subsequent socio-economic and cultural changes. Using a qualitative methodology based on semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation with 15 Odia workers, the study reveals that migration is primarily driven by structural push factors such as rural unemployment, agrarian stagnation, and climate-induced distress; while being facilitated by social networks. Pull factors include higher wages (₹15,000 - ₹35,000 vs. ₹300/day), industrial growth, and perceived social tolerance in Goa; though recruitment through contractors creates dependency relationships emphasizing structural holes. The findings reveal a fundamental paradox: while migrants experience economic gains and maintain cultural identity, their employment remains informal and structurally vulnerable. Socially, adaptation occurs within closed community networks characterized by strong ties, with limited integration into local Goan society. The study concludes that migration serves as a survival strategy rather than a vehicle for upward mobility, emphasizing the need for inclusive labour policies and migrant welfare mechanisms in semi-industrial regions like Goa.
References
1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
2. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1kz4h78
3. de Haas, H. (2010). Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective1. International Migration Review, 44(1), 227-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00804.x
4. Deshingkar, P., & Farrington, J. (2009). Circular migration and multilocational livelihood strategies in rural India. Oxford University Press.
5. Directorate of Planning, Statistics and Evaluation. (2022). Statistical Handbook of Goa 2021–22. Government of Goa.
6. Disha Foundation. (2020). Tribal livelihood migration in India: Situational analysis, gap assessment and future directions in 12 states of India. Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA), Government of India. https://www.dishafoundation.ngo.
7. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392
8. Jena, D. (2019) Issues and Challenges of Forced- Seasonal Labour Migrants: A study in Bolangir District of Odisha. Global Research Forum on Diaspora and Transnationalism
9. Manning, P. (2015). Migration in world history (2nd ed.). Routledge.
10. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. (2022). Periodic Labour Force Survey 2021–22. Government of India. https://microdata.gov.in/NADA/index.php/catalog/214
11. Nayak, L., & Mishra, A. K. (2008). Socioeconomic condition of fishermen and its effect on environment: A case study of Ganjam district, Orissa. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 7(1), 111–116. Technoscience Publications.
12. NITI Aayog. (2019). Report on Internal Migration in India and Climate Change. Government of India. https://www.niti.gov.in
13. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner. (2011). Migration tables. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. https://censusindia.gov.in/census.website/data/census-tables
14. Planning & Convergence Department. (2023). Odisha Economic Survey 2022–23. Government of Odisha. https://pc.odisha.gov.in/publication/economic-survey-report
15. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population division (2020). International migration 2020: Highlights. UN DESA. (ST/ESA/SER.A/452).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 South India Journal of Social Sciences

