Keywords
Haryana
Landless Communities
Livelihood
Dalits
Rehabilitation
Industrialization
Caste
Categories
How to Cite
Abstract
Land acquisition and grabbing remain the central means of dispossession in neoliberal India, affecting every section of society, but disproportionally. This paper attempts to explore the socio-economic impacts of land acquisition on landless Dalits and backward-caste communities in Haryana. The people affected by the Industrial Model Township (IMT), Rohtak, are taken as the case study to understand the larger implications of land acquisition on the life and livelihood of marginalised communities. Issues such as occupational shifts, changes and challenges arise in livelihood, exclusion and marginalisation in the whole process and in the implementation of rehabilitation and resettlement policies etc. are addressed. Drawing insights from extensive field data, this paper critically examines how the development process failed to recognise the pain and concern of these communities despite being equally dispossessed.
References
1. Ambedkar, B. R. (1917, May). Castes in India: Their Mechanism, Genesis and Development. Indian Antiquary, XLVI.
2. Anand, I. (2016). Dalit Emancipation and the Land Question. Economic and Political Weekly, LI(47), 12-14.
3. Balakrishnan, S. (2013). Land Conflicts and Cooperatives along Pune's Highways: Managing India's Agrarian to Urban Transition. Harvard: Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
4. Banner, S. (2005). How the Indians lost their land: Law and Power on frontier. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5. Bhalla, S. (1995). Development, Poverty and Policy: The Haryana Experience. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(41/42), 2619-2634.
6. Bhalla, S. (1999). Liberalisation, rural labour markets and the mobilisation of farm workers: The Haryana story in an all‐India context. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 26(2-3), 25-70.
7. Borras jr, S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2011). Towards a better understanding of Global Land Grabbing: An Editorial Introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 209-216.
8. Borras jr, S., & Franco, J. (2013). Global Land Grabbing and Political Reactions from Below. Third World Quarterly, 34(9), 1723-1747.
9. Borras jr., S., & Franco, J. (2012). Global Land Grabbing and Trajectories of Agrarian Change: A Preliminary Analysis. Journal of Agrarian Change, 12(1), 34-59.
10. Brass, T. (1990). Class struggle and the deproletarianisation of agricultural labour in Haryana (India). The Journal of Peasant Studies, 18(1), 36-67.
11. Cernea, M. (1997). The Risks and Reconstruction Model for Resettling Displaced Population. World Development, 25(10), 1569-1587.
12. Cernea, M. M. (2004). Impoverishment Risks, Risk Management, and reconstruction: A Model of Population Displacement and Resettlement. Presented on the UN Symposium on Hyderopower and Sustainable Development. Beijing. Retrieved from World Bank Group: https://commdev.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Impoverishment-Risks-Risk-Management-and-Reconstruction.pdf
13. Chakravorty, S. (2013). The Price of Land: Acquisition, Conflict, Consequence. New Delhi: Oxford.
14. Chatterjee, T. (2013). The Micro-politics of Urban Transformation in the context pf Globalisation: A case study of Gurgaon, India. Journal of South Asian studies, 36(2), 273-287.
15. Cowan, T. (2018). The Urban Village, Agrarian Transformation, and Rentier Capitalism in Gurgaon, India. Antipode, 50(5), 1244-1266.
16. Das, S. (2005). India: Homeless at Home. In P. Banarjee, S. B. Ray Chudhuri, & S. K. Das, Internal Displacement in South Asia: The relevance of the UN's Guiding Principles (pp. 113-143). New Delhi: Sage.
17. Fernandes, W. (2008). Paying the Price of someone else's Development. Agenda-Info Change, 12, 8-12.
18. Goldman, M. (2011). Speculative Urbanism and the making of the Next World City. Urban and Regional Research, 35(3), 555-581.
19. Govt. of Haryana. (2010). Revision of minimum floor rates and the Policy for Rehabilitation and Resettlement of Land Owners-Land Acqusition Oustees. Chandigarh: Govt. of Haryana.
20. Gurunani, S. (2013). Flexible Planning: The Making of India's 'Millennium City' Gurgaon. In A. Rademacher, & K. Sivaramakrishnan, Ecologies of Urbanism in India: Metropolitan Civility and Sustainabiity (pp. 119-143). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
21. Hall, D. (2013). Primitive accumulation, accumulation by dispossession and the Global land grab. Third World Quarterly, 34(9), 1582-1604.
22. Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.
23. Jenkins, R., Kennedy, L., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2014). Power, Policy and Protest: The Politics of India's Special Economic Zones. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
24. Jodhka, S. (2012). Agrarian Changes in the Times of (Neo-liberal) 'Crises': Revisiting Attached Labour in Haryana. Economic and Political Weekly, XLVII(26 & 27), 5-13.
25. Jodhka, S. S. (1995). Agrarian Changes, Unfreedom and Attached Labour. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(31/32), 2011-2013.
26. Jodhka, S. S. (2014). Emergent Ruralities: Revisting Village life and agrarian Change in Haryana. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(26 & 27).
27. Karna, R. K. (2024). The Politics of Land Acquisition, Dispossession and Reintegration: A Case Study of Industrial Model Township, Rohtak, Haryana. Hyderabad: Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis submitted to Department of Political Science, University of Hyderabad.
28. Kennedy, L. (2014). Haryana: Beyond the Rural-Urban Divide. In R. Jenkins, L. Kennedy, & P. Mukhopadhyay, Power, Policy and Protest: The Politics of India's Special Economic Zones (pp. 170-202). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
29. Kennedy, L. (2019). The politics of Land Acquisition in Haryana: Managing Dominent caste interests in the name of Development. Journal of Contemporary Asia.
30. Kennedy, L., Robin, K., & Zamuner, D. (2013). Comparing State-level policy responses to economic reforms in India: A subnational political economic prespective. Retrieved 9 25, 2018, from https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/10247?lang=en
31. Kothari, S. (1996, June 15). Whose Nation: The Displaced as Victims of Development. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(24), 1476-1485.
32. Kumar, N. (1999). Scheduled Castes in Transition. Economic and Political Weekly, 34(36), 2548-2549.
33. Levien, M. (2013). Regimes of Dispossession: From Steel Towns to Special Economic Zones. Development and Change, 44(2), 381-407.
34. Levien, M. (2018). Disposession without Development: Land Grabs in Neoliberal India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
35. Li, T. M. (2011). Centering Labour in the Land Grab debate. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 281-298.
36. Luxemburg, R. (2003). The Accumulation of Capital. London and New York: Routledge.
37. Marx, K. (1976 ). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume I. (B. Fowkes., Trans.) London: Penguin Books.
38. Mohapatra, L. K. (1999). Testing the Risks and Reconstruction Model on India's Resettlement Experiences. In M. C. Cernea, The Economis of Involuntary Resettlement: Questions and Challenges Directions in Development. Washington: World Bank.
39. Neeson, J. (1993). Commoners: Common Right, Enclouser and social Change in England, 1700-1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H., & Kerr, R. (2017). Land Grabbing, Social Differentiation, Intensified Migration and Food Security in Northern Ghana. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(2), 421-444.
41. Pai, S. (2010, August 28). Landing a Better Deal. The Indian Express.
42. Rajagopal, B. (2002, August 9). The violence of Development. Washington Post.
43. Robinson, W. C. (2003). Risks and Rights: The Causes, Consequences and Challenges of Development-Induced Displacement. The Brooking Institute.
44. Rostow, W. (1959). The Stages of Economic Growth. Economic Histroy Review, 12(1), 1-16.
45. Sathe, D. (2017). The Political Economy of Land Acquisition in India: How a Village stops being one. New Delhi: Palgrave Macmillan.
46. Serageldin, I. (2006). Involuntary Resettlement in World Bank-financed projects: Reducing Impoverishment Risks for the Affected People. In H. M. Mathur, Mapping Resettlement in India: Approaches, Issues, Experiences (pp. 45-66). New Delhi: Oxford press.
47. Shergill, B. S., Kaur, M., & Tiwana, S. S. (2018). Rural Household Livelihoods, Non-Farm Economy and Landless Workforce: Evidence from the village Economy of Haryana, India. Economic Affairs, 63(1), 09-20.
48. Singh, J. (1997). Dalits in Haryana Politics. Economic and Political Weekly, 32(43), 2787-2788.
49. Zoomers, A. (2010). Globalisation and the Foreignisation of Space: Seven Processes driving the current global land grab. The Journal of peasant Studies, 37(2), 429-447.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 South India Journal of Social Sciences