Abstract
This empirical study examines the implementation of regional languages in Indian legal higher education by analyzing both challenges and potential solutions through a comprehensive mixed-methods approach. The study employed a mixed-methods design with a sample of 500 participants across 10 states, including 100 faculty members and 400 students from 25 law colleges. The data collection utilized validated questionnaires, achieving a response rate of 94.4%. This study tested four hypotheses using both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. The research confirmed all the hypotheses, revealing a significant positive correlation between regional language support and academic performance (χ² = 15.82, p = 0.003). Students receiving bilingual instruction demonstrated 23% better comprehension and 15% higher retention rates. Resource availability emerged as the primary implementation factor, accounting for 38% of the variance. Faculty support was strongly correlated with institutional readiness (r = 0.68, p < 0.01). The findings support the implementation of a flexible, bilingual approach to legal education, emphasizing the need for substantial resource development, faculty training, and institutional support. This study bridges a crucial gap in the existing literature by providing robust empirical evidence on the effectiveness of regional language implementation in legal education and offering concrete recommendations for policy development and implementation strategies.
References
BCID-0468-2024 (LE Circular-06/2024)-Comprehensive Implementation of Legal Education Reforms. Retrieved January 11, 2025, from https://www.barcouncilofindia.org/info/comprehens-ku2hwr
Getman, J. G. (1969). The development of Indian Legal Education: The impact of the language problem. Journal of Legal Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ009568
Higher education and regional languages. (n.d.). Drishti IAS. https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-news-editorials/higher-education-and-regional-languages
Ministry of Education. (2024). Government of India directs all school and higher education institutions. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/PIB1997882.pdf
NhEQF-UGC. (2022). Draft national higher education qualifications framework (NHEQF)| Retrieved January 11, 2025, from https://www.ugc.gov.in/pdfnews/2990035_Final-NHEQF.pdf
Petrovic, J., & Majumdar, S. (2010). Language planning for equal educational opportunity in multilingual states: the case of India. International Multilingual Research Journal, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313150903500960
Salient features of nep 2020: higher education 1. The fundamental principles of the policy.
Salunke, S. (2024). Legal education in India: Reflecting on the past for a brighter future. Asian Journal of Legal Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/23220058241305560
Schukoske, J. E. (2009). Legal Education Reform in India: Dialogue among Indian law teachers. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1452888
Vishwakarma, V. K. (2022). Language and legal education in India. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching, 6(32). https://doi.org/10.54850/jrspelt.6.32.004

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 South India Journal of Social Sciences