Crossref JGate SDG Google Scholar Open Access Creative Commons WorldCat OCLC DORA Scilit Semantic Scholar SDG
Geographical Indications Regime in India: Commitments and Consequences
ARTICLE PDF FILE

Keywords

Geographical Indications
Challenges
Place
Legal
Opportunities
Product Differentiation

Categories

How to Cite

Kavya, S., Gummadi, S., & Karun, S. (2025). Geographical Indications Regime in India: Commitments and Consequences. South India Journal of Social Sciences, 23(1), 305-319. https://doi.org/10.62656/SIJSS.v23i1.1772

Abstract

Getting into WTO willy-nilly brought many changes in India’s trade sector, with IPR being a dominant tool in the hands of powerful economies. Geographical Indicators (GI) are a form of complete ownership over knowledge-based products, sometimes even traditional articles, and their necessity is rationalized through their possibility of being used for the benefit of the owners/producers of commodities. This group of beneficiaries is believed to essentially include people with low incomes. This paper is intended to bring out specific fundamental issues like the distribution of benefits across sectors and beneficiaries. Here, we integrate qualitative and quantitative data using a mixed-methods methodology and some crucial case studies as support.  Data used are also from official GI registries, government papers, and academic literature, which provide secondary data to understand patterns in GI registrations across several product categories. The skewed distribution of the benefits of GI registration across beneficiaries is noted. It raises an issue of the possibility of GI favouring veiled capitalist tendencies of the usual market operators, with a new tool.

ARTICLE PDF FILE

References

Clark, L. F., & Kerr, W. A. (2017). Climate change and terroir: The challenge of adapting geographical indications. The Journal of World Intellectual Property,20(3–4),88–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12078

Cummings, J. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class. Journal of Political Economy, 7(4), 425–455. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1817954

Das, K. (2010). Prospects and Challenges of Geographical Indications in India. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 13(2), 148–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00363.x

Geographic Indications as a Tool to Promote Sustainability? Café de Colombia and Tequila Compared - Ecology Law Quarterly. (2012, October 29). Ecology Law Quarterly. https://www.ecologylawquarterly.org/currents/currents39-06-barnette-2012-1020/

Josling, T. (2006). The War on Terroir: Geographical Indications as a Transatlantic Trade Conflict. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(3), 337–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00075.x

Kulshreshtha, A. C. (2011). MEASURING THE UNORGANIZED SECTOR IN INDIA. Review of Income and Wealth, 57(s1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2011.00452.x

Marie‐Vivien, D. (2010). The Role of the State in the Protection of Geographical Indications: From Disengagement in France/Europe to Significant Involvement in India. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 13(2), 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00375.x

Ross, S. (2024, May 13). Theory of Asymmetric Information Definition & Challenges. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/042415/what-theory-asymmetric-information-economics.asp

Van Ittersum, K., Candel, M. J. J. M., & Meulenberg, M. T. G. (2003). The influence of the image of a product’s region of origin on product evaluation. Journal of Business Research, 56(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00223-5

Vinayan, S. (2017). Geographical indications in India: Issues and challenges—An overview. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 20(3–4), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12076

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 South India Journal of Social Sciences