Abstract
This study employs the Assam assembly elections of 2016 and 2021 as benchmarks to examine voter preferences for freebies in comparison to issue-based pledges. This study's main research questions are how much do freebie promises affect the voters of Assam's preferences compared to issue based commitments and what do voters of Assam prefer when it comes to choosing between welfare and development commitments and promises of freebies? Based on these questions, the study proposes an argument that long-term developmental promises are more important to the voters of Assam than freebie promises, which stimulate short-term voter interest. This study utilises surveys with a structured questionnaire as its major data collection method. Based on population and urban-rural classification, information was gathered from 400 respondents in four districts of Assam namely Kamrup (M), Nagaon, Sonitpur, and Dhubri. The results demonstrate that although voters give governance-related concerns like healthcare, education, the economy, and illegal immigration top priority, they also clearly favour welfare-oriented giveaways that provide long-term advantages over immediate handouts. This study advances our knowledge of voter reasoning and decision-making in Assam's electoral democracy by examining these processes.
References
1. Adhikari, P., Mariam, S., & Thomson, R. (2024). The fulfilment of election pledges in India. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 54(1), 133-151.
2. BJP Election Manifesto (2016). Assam Vision Document 2016-2025. Accessed on 25th November, 2024. https://mmscmsguy.assam.gov.in/sites/default/files/swf_utility_folder/departments/mmscmsguy_webcomindia_org_oid_2/this_comm/vision-document.pdf
3. Election Commission of India-State Election, 2016 to the Legislative Assembly of Assam. Chief Electoral Officer, Assam, Accessed on 24th September, 2024. https://ceoassam.nic.in/assembly/pdf/2016/result/details_results.pdf
4. Election Commission of India-State Election, 2021 to the Legislative Assembly of Assam. Chief Electoral Officer, Assam, Accessed on 24th September, 2024. https://ceoassam.nic.in/assembly/2021/form21E_2021.html
5. Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (2003). Time-of-voting decision and susceptibility to campaign effects, 1-21.
6. Halida, R., Susianto, H., Mujani, S., & Pratama, A. J. (2022). Vote-selling as unethical behavior: Effects of voter’s inhibitory self-control, decision toward vote-buying money, and candidate’s quality in Indonesia election. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(2), 570-587.
7. Henderson, M., & Hillygus, D. S. (2016). Changing the clock: the role of campaigns in the timing of vote decision. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(3), 761-770.
8. Kanungo R. (2020). Election Manifestos in India: Beyond Election Campaigns. eJournal of University School of Law and Legal Studies, 1(2), 1-14.
9. Kumar, A. (2024). Freebie debates and budgetary priorities: Economic growth-led India or inclusive India. The International Journal of Community and Social Development, 6(1), 97-114.
10. Marzęcki, R. (2017). How to engage “democratic Natives”? Political sophistication as important determinant of civic activity of young citizens in new democracies (The case of Poland). Romanian Journal of Political Sciences, 17(1), 135-169.
11. Moundekar, B., Sharma, G., & Lonkar, R. (2025). Social Welfare or Vote-Buying?: Investigating the Ethical and Administrative Challenges of Freebie-Driven Governance. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1), 1-28.
12. Padmanabhan, S. (2021). To take or not to take: is the freebie culture in Tamil Nadu elections a threat to Indian democracy?. Asian Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 215-237.
13. Patel, A. & Nath, H. K. (2021). Rahul Gandhi releases Congress manifesto for Assam polls, promises to nullify CAA, give 5 lakh govt jobs. India Today. Accessed on 25th November, 2024. https://www.indiatoday.in/elections/assam-assembly-polls-2021/story/congress-manifesto-assam-scrap-caa-5-lakh-jobs-rahul-gandhi-1781621-2021-03-20
14. Sardesai, S., & Mishra, J. (2017). Time of vote choice in India. Studies in Indian Politics, 5(1), 82-91.
15. Školník, M. (2022). Gifts for votes? Vote buying as a predictor of turnout in Latin America. Latin American Policy, 13(1), 20-32.
16. Verma, A., Saxena, S., & Alam, M. B. (2022). Changing dynamics of voting pattern affecting the psyche of Voters by offering freebies. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 13(3), 319-328.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 South India Journal of Social Sciences