Crossref JGate SDG Google Scholar Open Access Creative Commons WorldCat OCLC DORA Scilit Semantic Scholar SDG
When Training Meets Reality: Unveiling the Impact of Continuous Professional Development on Teaching Efficacy in Bihar
ARTICLE PDF FILE

Keywords

Continuous professional development(CPD)
teaching efficay
thematic analysis
semi-structure interview
secondary teachers

Categories

How to Cite

Nath, R., Kumar, J., & Pandey, C. P. (2026). When Training Meets Reality: Unveiling the Impact of Continuous Professional Development on Teaching Efficacy in Bihar. South India Journal of Social Sciences, 24(3), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.62656/SIJSS.v24i3.2345

Abstract

Continuous Professional Development (CPD) plays a central role in enhancing teaching efficacy, which refers to teachers' belief in their ability to effectively facilitate student learning, manage classrooms, and implement instructional strategies. This study examines the impact of CPD on teaching efficacy by exploring the experiences of teachers. The research employs a qualitative design, involving semi-structured interviews with secondary school teachers. The study utilizes the trial version of NVivo 15 for data analysis. To identify the key trends and findings, thematic analysis is applied. The Interview items emphasize the teachers’ CPD experiences, self-reported improvements in teaching effectiveness, and challenges faced during their professional development. The result shows how crucial CPD is for maintaining professional growth, boosting self-esteem, and dealing with new educational obstacles. However, other important factors that influence CPD enrolment include time constraints, accessibility, and relevance. The research concludes by providing suggestions for maximizing CPD programs to achieve their impact on teaching effectiveness and overall student learning outcomes.

ARTICLE PDF FILE

References

1. Akiba, M., & Liang, G. (2016). Effects of teacher professional learning activities on student achievement growth. In The Journal of Educational Research (Vol. 109, Issue 1, pp. 99–110). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.924470

2. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-08589-000

4. Bolam, R. (2002). Professional development and professionalism. The principles and practice of educational management, 103-118. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED474979

5. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003

6. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED606743

7. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

8. Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society and Education, 7(3), 252-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515

9. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915

10. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391.https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512

11. Hargreaves, A. (2001). Changing teachers, changing times. https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/5203122

12. Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of educational research, 86(4), 945-980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800

13. Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 12, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001

14. Knowles, M. S. (1980). From pedagogy to andragogy. Religious Education, 75(4), 202-211. https://colllearning.info/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/The-Modern-Practice-of-Adult-Education.pdf

15. Maslow, A. H. (1967). A theory of metamotivation: The biological rooting of the value-life. Journal of humanistic psychology, 7(2), 93-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/002216786700700201

16. Nkundabakura, P., Nsengimana, T., Uwamariya, E., Nyirahabimana, P., Nkurunziza, J. B., Mukamwambali, C., & Iyamuremye, A. (2024). Effectiveness of the continuous professional development training on upper primary mathematics and science, and elementary technology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in Rwanda. Discover Education, 3(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00091-0

17. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609

18. Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to Learn. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2334965

19. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

20. UNESCO. (2023). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO Publishing. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/education-sustainable-development-goals-learning-objectives

21. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

22. Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981-1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 South India Journal of Social Sciences

Disclaimer: This site displays third-party advertisements provided through Google AdSense. We do not control the content of these ads and do not endorse any products or services advertised. Ad revenue helps minimize APCs and supports the ongoing maintenance, development, and open accessibility of this academic journal.