Crossref JGate SDG Google Scholar Open Access Creative Commons WorldCat OCLC DORA Scilit Semantic Scholar SDG
Comparative Analysis of Customer Acquisition Performance of Swiggy, Zomato, and Blinkit in the Digital Era: A Study of Visakhapatnam District in Andhra Pradesh
ARTICLE PDF FILE

Keywords

Customer Loyalty
digital marketing

Categories

How to Cite

J, S. D. P., & P, S. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Customer Acquisition Performance of Swiggy, Zomato, and Blinkit in the Digital Era: A Study of Visakhapatnam District in Andhra Pradesh. South India Journal of Social Sciences, 24(5), 52-56. https://doi.org/10.62656/SIJSS.v24i5.2545

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital commerce has transformed the methods through which businesses acquire and retain customers. Digital platforms like Swiggy, Zomato and Blinkit work with online advertising, applications, artificial intelligence, and customer relationship strategies and target customers through digital cartography. Using the customer acquisition data from January to May 2026, this paper compares the relative brand equity of these three leading digital platforms in Visakhapatnam which is classified as Tier-II city. The data is based on six customer acquisition parameters i.e.,  Advertisement Impressions, Advertisement Clicks, App Registrations; First Orders, Repeat Customers and Loyal Customers and five essential acquisition metrics Viz., Click Through Rate, Lead Conversion Rate, Customer Conversion rate, Repeat Customer Rate and Loyalty Rate. The Average Rank Method has been used for evaluating the performance of individual companies. Results showed Swiggy ranked highest with an average rank of 1.80 due to its better reach and retention capabilities in advertisements. With no extremes in performance across all metrics, Zomato scored second; Blinkit, while converting easy customers to real ones with remarkable efficiency, performed poorly when it came to retaining them. The research finds that a sustainable competitive edge in the digital age relies not just on bringing customers to the brand but also on nurturing long-term customer loyalty with customized services and better-quality customer experience.

ARTICLE PDF FILE

References

1. Chaffey, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2022). Digi-tal Marketing (8th ed.). Pearson.

2. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson.

3. Kumar, V. & Reinartz, W. (2018). Customer Relationship Management: Concept, strategy, and tool (3rd ed). Springer.

4. Lemon K. N., & Verhoef P.C. — 2016 Under-standing customer experience over the customer lifecycle. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96.

5. Payne, A., & Frow, P. (2017). Strategic Cus-tomer Management. Cambridge University Press.

6. Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004). Return on marketing. Journal of Market-ing, 68(1), 109–127.

7. Gupta, S., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2006) Customer Indicators, Report on Financial Performance. Marketing Science, 25(6), 718–739.

8. Solomon, M. R. (2021). Consumer Behaviour: Buying, Having, and Being (13th ed.) Pearson.

9. Ryan, D. (2020). Understanding Digital Market-ing (5th ed.). Kogan Page.

10. Tiago, M. T. P. M. B., & Veríssimo J. M. C (2014). Digital marketing and social media. Business Horizons, 57(6), 703–708.

11. Introduction Verhoef, P. C., Kannan, P. K., & Inman, J. J. (2015). Omni-channel Customer Management - from the world of standard multi-channel retailing. Journal of Retailing, 91(2), 174–181.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 South India Journal of Social Sciences

Disclaimer: This site displays third-party advertisements provided through Google AdSense. We do not control the content of these ads and do not endorse any products or services advertised. Ad revenue helps minimize APCs and supports the ongoing maintenance, development, and open accessibility of this academic journal.